Select Page

The Conclusions and Recommendations may be combined or, in long reports, presented in separate sections.

Conclusions and recommendations

If there are not any recommendations to be manufactured as a result of the project, call this section just Conclusions.

The Conclusions section sums up the key points of the discussion, the fundamental top features of your design, or even the significant outcomes of one’s investigation. As the function is to round the story off of your project, it will:

  • be written to relate directly to the aims regarding the project as stated in the Introduction
  • indicate the extent to which the aims have already been achieved
  • summarise the findings that are key outcomes or information in your report
  • acknowledge limitations while making recommendations for future work (where applicable)
  • Highlight the usefulness or significance of one’s work.

The conclusions should relate to the aims associated with the work:

The aim of this project would be to design a mobile phone tower for a suburban location..

The mobile phone tower presented here could be erected safely in a street that is suburban.

It needs a total part of no more than 2m 2 l, and has now the safety that is following.

This investigation will review the quantity of passengers with the Monash University Clayton-Caulfield inter-campus bus to be able to recommend adjustments towards the service if required.

Analysis associated with survey data obtained in this project shows that usage of the Clayton-Caulfield inter-campus bus has increased by 24% in the past five years. It is suggested that frequency be increased during peak usage.

The Conclusions section below is from a known level 2 Civil Engineering Alternative Designs report presenting two designs for a an overpass bridge. Click on the buttons that are coloured look at comments.


Each one of the two bridge designs Lecturer’s comment:
An elegant beginning for a Conclusions follows on neatly from the discussion that is preceding. In this case, moreover it indicates that the aims associated with the project have already been met. presented in this report fulfil the criteria specified when you look at the project brief. Both designs Lecturer’s comment:
The main findings or outcomes – in this case the key top features of the designs – are then recapped. incorporate round piers on piled foundations, that are used considering that the soil conditions are unknown and perhaps unstable. Design 1, a simple composite I-girder bridge, has the benefit of being made of steel and so has longer spans and fewer piers.

Design 2, a beam that is super-T >Design 2 Lecturer’s comment:
The significance of the outcome – in cases like this the final recommendation – is obviously stated. is therefore recommended. It includes Lecturer’s comment:
To finish off, the achievement of this project is reinforced. An overpass that is affordable superior durability, and fully meets certain requirements associated with the design brief.

Always address limitations and suggest how they may be overcome in future work. The below that is excerpt through the Conclusions of a study on a project investigating the consequence of pulsation on heat transfer in horizontal pipe flow.

Experimental results Lecturer’s comment:
Key conclusions drawn from the project. indicated that pulsed flow without flow reversal had no effect that is significant with steady flow. Preliminary experiments with reversed flow, however, clearly indicated increased heat transfer. That is likely due Lecturer’s comment:
Provide a explanation that is possible notable results, especially unexpected ones. to the large disturbances when you look at the hydrodynamic boundary layer as soon as the flow changes direction. Further research Lecturer’s comment:
Recommend further research to handle any extra work you think will be useful. is advised to determine the utmost achievable enhancement.

It ought to be noted that Lecturer’s comment:
Acknowledge limitations or errors and suggest explanations solutions that are and/or. the experimental results try not to agree with the theoretical equations. This can be as a result of deposits which developed inside the pipe, or even to thermocouple temperature that is inconsistent. Therefore, regular inspection regarding the test rig is preferred.

For an extremely report that is long it really is acceptable to present the conclusions and recommendations in point form:

The prototype robot courier presented here has been shown to manage to delivering documents autonomously in an office environment. It offers demonstrated the next aspects of mobile robotics:

  1. Localisation: The Kalman filter-based localisation algorithm achieved sub-centimeter accuracy under normal operating conditions.
  2. Environment modelling: The occupancy map was updated dynamically to add obstacles not included in the map that is original.
  3. Path planning: A distance transform-based path planner using obstacle transforms produced a globally optimal local entrapment-free way to the goal.